H
HopeToBe
Guest
I have not really payed much attention to this, however I normally cut the neck to a thickness of .0083'' which gives me a total size of .260'' given the bullets I use.
For fun I measured them today, they have been trimmed (cut length) twice, and the loaded rounds where all .2595''. Using the ball micrometer I found the neck to now be at .0081''. OK, it is not much and all of the brass had a consistent thickness of this.
Ensuring that my micrometer was not wrong in some way I measured some brass turned yesterday and they were all .0083'' as they were supposed to.
So - does it matter? Is it normal? I assume this favours keeping the numbers of times the brass is used under control, and this number of reloads should be more or less uniform across the batch of brass in use?
For fun I measured them today, they have been trimmed (cut length) twice, and the loaded rounds where all .2595''. Using the ball micrometer I found the neck to now be at .0081''. OK, it is not much and all of the brass had a consistent thickness of this.
Ensuring that my micrometer was not wrong in some way I measured some brass turned yesterday and they were all .0083'' as they were supposed to.
So - does it matter? Is it normal? I assume this favours keeping the numbers of times the brass is used under control, and this number of reloads should be more or less uniform across the batch of brass in use?
Last edited by a moderator: