Pete, please KEEP WONDERING..... hopefully enough that you actually TRY a fat-butt chamber (Franny has never tried this, nor much else in his time as "testing" is not really his thang) please experiment with this...... I can't count the number of people I've helped with klikky guns just by getting them to hone out their chambers bigger using sandpaper! "clearance IS clearance!".... but ya got's to get enough to make it work.
Here's where your brain is right now, this minnit Pete...... you're asking yourself "HOW can more or less clearance make any difference?? I mean, "clearance is clearance".... right??" And you're asking yourself "HOW could brass possibly expand "beyond??"......"
It's simply because liberals don't feel a need to express a REASON, nor a mechanism, but just saying "yes" or "no" is enough because "their opinion is as relevant as yours"
Here's a copy and paste from another post today, from my reply to Jim O'Hare.....
Quote Originally Posted by jim1K View Post
I have annealed for 10 years and it works.... I shot and set records with brass that was fired a 100 times.... I have cases that have not been retired that were shot over 300 times.... You gain longevity, uniform neck tension, uniform seating depth and more uniform sizing..... Annealed correctly can not be improved on by one method over an other, so what works can be checked by testing spring back, it should be .0005....... Jim
THANK YOU Jim, nothing trumps real world experience
Many folks reading this forum won't believe you but THANK YOU!! And to those unbelievers...... unbelief only means YOU can't get those results, not that Jim can't.
As my buddy Jesse says, "Ya cain't argue with facts!" (altho most folks do..... well over 50% of our population will ALWAYS argue with facts because they can't help it )
Sorry Franny..... I don't CARE what people like you say, I lissen to people who DO