Well, I guess it's rude awakening time.
Just about any top notch custom bullet maker will have dies from a top notch manufacturer. The dies will produce a bullet that, dimensionally wise, is perfect.
But every bullet maker is at the mercy of the raw components that he has to purchase. Jackets seem to the big factor in how well a particular lot of bullets will shoot.
In years past, I have had bullets that I have won National Events with, only to have the next lot not worth wasting powder on. Why? Did the bullet maker suddenly forget how to make bullets?? No. Different raw components.
I dissagree in the saying that bullets are cheaper than barrels. Great bullets are more valuable to a Benchrest Shooter than Gold. In the end, this game is STILL about barrels, bullets, and tuning. You get those three right, and Benchrest becomes a much easier game. If any one of those three is not up to snuff, you are just another name somewhere in the middle of the score sheet.
Yes, it is a crap shoot. I probably have no less than 30,000 6mm bullets on hand, of those, over 1/2 are probably not worth wasting good primers and powder on.
As to your Question, the Barts 68 Ultra is a proven winner. Bart certainly is one of the premier bullet makers. keep in mind, he has the originol Watson Point Up Die as well, which by all accounts, produces one of the best 7 ogive straight shank bullets ever made.
In Mike Ratigans book, he speaks of 'Superman Bullets'. That is, you get lucky and score a great lot that just all seem to want to go on top of one another. He ain't lying.