.243 Ai

As far as the idea that the Ackley design grips the chamber walls better than a non Ackley cartridge is concerned, this is just plain wishful thinking!

You're completely wrong about this. Several years back a guy posted on this very forum - right here - describing tests he ran to see what effect an Improved case had on chamber wall grip. The results were dramatically conclusive and left no doubt whatsoever.
 
Ackman:

Folks who fire too light a fire forming load in the Ackley chamber will wind up with a shortened brass, or a completely ruined piece of brass. See the picture. Ackley cautioned about it happening. The .348 Winchester parent case headspaces on the rim and is less dangerous to fire form with a starting load than a rimless case. A rimless case, with normal headspace, when pushed forward by the firing pin strike, can result in primer protrusion as the brass shortens when the body and shoulder form. Without sufficient pressure to overcome chamber wall friction and fully form to the chamber, the brass will display a protruding primer. This brass has actually shortened slightly.

The cases shown dented by gas blowing past the neck are .009" to .012" shorter than the properly formed case. In a rimless case this could result in a hazardous headspace condition upon subsequent firing. In the rimmed case it merely ruined the brass. Voodoo, refers to the necessity of using a chamber properly dimensioned for a slight crush fit on unfired brass, using mid to hot loads for fire forming, or seating a bullet into the lands to prevent the shortening phenomena - all unnecessary with standard cartridges.

It is always a good idea to be cautious when using Ackley's load data, as he had a tendency to load hot. When coupled with variances between canister powders over the ensuing years, I would rather err on the side of caution.

To the novice shooter contemplating the Ackley Improved series of cartridges, these facts should be discussed. What Ackley cartridges offer is a good way to experiment with non-standard loading techniques as an introduction to full fledged wildcats.

Enjoy shooting your Ackley cartridges. They are cool and fun.
 

Attachments

  • Ackley Brass.jpg
    Ackley Brass.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 2,342
Axlenut.....

I recognize that you are no novice at this stuff.

You and I walked the same path, and came to different conclusions, kinda like one took the high road and one took the low road.

This stuff is just a hobby and what we do to make it fun for us...no big deal at all.

A good discussion of different points of view with good people never hurts a thing, it's all good.

It is intreaging as to how two people can experience the exact same thing and arrive at different conclustions...the human mind. My wife tells me I'm not normal anyway...guess that explains it! Hee Hee!
 
You're completely wrong about this. Several years back a guy posted on this very forum - right here - describing tests he ran to see what effect an Improved case had on chamber wall grip. The results were dramatically conclusive and left no doubt whatsoever.


I should just stay out of this but........ I won't.

Ackman, you're wrong. Other chamberings grip the walls of the chamber equally well. Even super tapered cases like the 22-250 grip well enough to pop up primers and blow off caseheads. It's dead easy to test this stuff. Tapered cases like the 22-250 don't get sticky because of slippage in the chamber nor because of "increased bolt thrust" but because of simple geometry.

al
 
The cases shown dented by gas blowing past the neck are .009" to .012" shorter than the properly formed case. In a rimless case this could result in a hazardous headspace condition upon subsequent firing. In the rimmed case it merely ruined the brass. Voodoo, refers to the necessity of using a chamber properly dimensioned for a slight crush fit on unfired brass, using mid to hot loads for fire forming, or seating a bullet into the lands to prevent the shortening phenomena - all unnecessary with standard cartridges.

To the novice shooter contemplating the Ackley Improved series of cartridges, these facts should be discussed. What Ackley cartridges offer is a good way to experiment with non-standard loading techniques as an introduction to full fledged wildcats.

You have it backwards. Voodoo is the silly notions that people have about AI cartridges, and the silly things they do as a result. It's hard to figure why some people like to make such a big deal out of this stuff. A properly headspaced chamber is all it takes, that's it.....any cartridge will have problems if the chamber isn't right. Actually, short headspace isn't a problem when forming brass in an AI chamber....but it would be in a standard chamber. Special fireform loads, fillers, reduced loads with fast powder, jamming the lands....that's the voodoo done by people who don't know any better because they listened to others who don't know any better. It's really just stupid easy to make one of these cartridges work.

Loading techniques are the same. What Ackley cartridges offer has nothing to do with possibly messing with wildcats in the future. What they represent is an easy way to get more horsepower from an existing case by making it a little bigger.

Those pictures don't mean much.
 
I should just stay out of this but........ I won't.

Ackman, you're wrong. Other chamberings grip the walls of the chamber equally well. Even super tapered cases like the 22-250 grip well enough to pop up primers and blow off caseheads. It's dead easy to test this stuff. Tapered cases like the 22-250 don't get sticky because of slippage in the chamber nor because of "increased bolt thrust" but because of simple geometry.

al

Al, believe whatever you want to believe. But no, I'm not wrong. And blown caseheads/etc have nothing to do with this. But.....









your confusion makes no difference to me.









Most of my rifles are chambered for AI cartridges and chamber wall grip/ bolt thrust is simply a non- factor. It had nothing to do with anything when deciding to go AI. Some people on forums talk about it like it's a big deal. I shoot bolt guns and it never was-still isn't even the teensy-est concern to me.









But.......









Some years back a fellow - I believe his name was White - did some very interesting tests to find out about chamber wall grip. Using a T/C barrel chambered for 30-30 and 30-30AI. And he posted the results right on this here very forum. The results were so dramatic that even you, foremost-authority-on-everything-shooting, would be forced to agree there was something to the chamber grip thing.
 
Yeahh, they ALL grip the chamber walls.

Anyone "testing" with a contender is suspect.

I don't "believe" stuff, I TEST IT.

al
 
What do you mean "I haven't done it"????


I most certainly have......... with many cartridges AI'd and not. I have all of my reamers ground for some sort of "Improvement" generally, for something in the .243AI class I'll opt for around .010 body taper and a 35degree shoulder instead of Ackley's 40. BECAUSE I've tested 8 different Ackley profile reamers and found them wanting. P.O.Ackley is a hero of mine but his improvements aren't as refined as I'd like. I have them ground Ackley-style not to reduce bolt thrust but to aid in smooth extraction and resizing. I can tell you why a case like the 22-250 will stick while a 22-250AI will not but it's better that you actually test it yourself and SEE it.


Regarding the testing, I can describe some tests for you to do your own self to PROVE that nearly all cases grip the chamber walls. I've tested different degreasers, different amounts of headpace, different chamber finishes, different tapers, I've gone so far as to work through entire loading sequences JUST to establish when and how cases grip and when and how caseheads yield. I've DONE the tests to prove that cases don't slide due to body taper. I can't imagine where you've gotten your "information" regarding what I have and haven't tested but your lack of understanding regarding case head separations and cases sticking shows a lack of understanding of the subject. Just because you "remember someone named White" posting on an internet forum doesn't somehow validate your position. Especially when "someone maybe named White" used a Contender break action for his testing.

A Contender action is simply too poorly supported, to prone to flexing to really "prove" anything valid. Find Mr White's test regimen and we can have some ground for discussion.


You state thus, quote >>>>> "Most of my rifles are chambered for AI cartridges and chamber wall grip/ bolt thrust is simply a non- factor. It had nothing to do with anything when deciding to go AI." <<<<< unquote.

So why DO YOU chose AI'd cartridges?

al
 
BTW Ackman,

Aren't you the same guy who used to go on about "case capacities of the 6-250 being similar to Improved BR's so it should do the same thing" and "no way the 6BR can do what it says" and "case capacity is the limiting factor" and back several years ago when the 6X47L was only a dream............ cases weren't even available yet.......... you used to spout all sorts of capacity figures from the reloading manuals?????



Welll........ it's now NOW and I've spent last week, all day yesterday and half of today TESTING a 6X47L and it simply beatss the .243AI and the 6X250 and the 6MM AI and everything else in its class. Back then you admitted to never having pushed big bullets so I won't quote any big-bullet numbers but this you WILL understand. As mentioned before, the 6X47L case unimproved will push 70gr varmint bullets to 4000fps. I did it thru an 8" twist barrel. But more importantly, I can do it again, and I can tell you how to do it and my cases will last forever at this velocity. I fired 5 cases 15 times and primers are still tight. It may prove out that I need to drop down to 3900-3950 to develop my "safety margin" for shooting furry thangs but even a solid 3900 is impressive.

And it's smaller than the .243AI case.


4000fps with 70's ........ with case life.


WHY???


And what does this statement mean? "Actually, short headspace isn't a problem when forming brass in an AI chamber....but it would be in a standard chamber. Special fireform loads, fillers, reduced loads with fast powder, jamming the lands...." Please describe the difference?


al



BTW, you and Keith have both got better numbers than me out of the .243AI. I just went back and checked my synopses and found the following:

This is after many pages of load workups up to 3850fps with 70's and 3650+ w/88's. Years of testing data and dogpatch work.


68-70gr bullets- VARget, H380 etc.......I have many days reporting 3800fps and great accuracy BUT.....sooner or later there's a "TOO HOT!!" notation explaining wrecked brass etc.

87-88gr VMax's and Bergers using mainly 4831SC/RL-19 class powders show the same pattern........a lot of really promising loads but later "TOO HOT!!"


My notes near the end of my work with the .243AI are more like "I have decided to limit the .243AI to 3650fps w/70's and around 3500fps with 85-88's to give some leeway for temp changes at the dogpatch." This was based on Lapua and Win brass, Norma I'd back off another 50fps. Admittedly these numbers are somewhat conservative BUT....... my deal is all about long life and consistent results.



Around this time I was discovering the 6BR's potential.


Now I'm finding the 6X47L to be a souped up 6BR, accuracy AND safety/caselife.
 
What do you mean "I haven't done it"????







A Contender action is simply too poorly supported, to prone to flexing to really "prove" anything valid. Find Mr White's test regimen and we can have some ground for discussion.

********Contender BARREL, not Contender action. A Contender BARREL in a fixture. It was a very complete writeup back prior to this board changing format. And there's nothing to discuss. He did what he did and if you didn't see it, then you didn't see it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You state thus, quote >>>>> "Most of my rifles are chambered for AI cartridges and chamber wall grip/ bolt thrust is simply a non- factor. It had nothing to do with anything when deciding to go AI." <<<<< unquote.

So why DO YOU chose AI'd cartridges?

******A little more capacity, a little more horsepower from the same case. Not a tough thing to figure out.
al

Honestly al, you're a windbag.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW Ackman,

Aren't you the same guy who used to go on about "case capacities of the 6-250 being similar to Improved BR's so it should do the same thing" and "no way the 6BR can do what it says" and "case capacity is the limiting factor" and back several years ago when the 6X47L was only a dream............ cases weren't even available yet.......... you used to spout all sorts of capacity figures from the reloading manuals?????

*********No that wasn't me. And I don't spout anything from reloading manuals. Never have. But you do a lot of spouting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welll........ it's now NOW and I've spent last week, all day yesterday and half of today TESTING a 6X47L and it simply beatss the .243AI and the 6X250 and the 6MM AI and everything else in its class. Back then you admitted to never having pushed big bullets so I won't quote any big-bullet numbers but this you WILL understand. As mentioned before, the 6X47L case unimproved will push 70gr varmint bullets to 4000fps. I did it thru an 8" twist barrel. But more importantly, I can do it again, and I can tell you how to do it and my cases will last forever at this velocity. I fired 5 cases 15 times and primers are still tight. It may prove out that I need to drop down to 3900-3950 to develop my "safety margin" for shooting furry thangs but even a solid 3900 is impressive.

*********That's very exciting. I'm happy for you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's smaller than the .243AI case.


4000fps with 70's ........ with case life.


WHY???

********** I don't know. Should I? Maybe Lapua brass will handle more pressure.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

And what does this statement mean? "Actually, short headspace isn't a problem when forming brass in an AI chamber....but it would be in a standard chamber. Special fireform loads, fillers, reduced loads with fast powder, jamming the lands...." Please describe the difference?

*******I figured some nitwit would question that one. With a standard chamber, if headspace is very much too short the bolt won't close. An Ackley chamber only contacts the neck/shoulder of a new unfired case and will handle a lot more crush than the oft-quoted .004".


al

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, you and Keith have both got better numbers than me out of the .243AI. I just went back and checked my synopses and found the following:

This is after many pages of load workups up to 3850fps with 70's and 3650+ w/88's. Years of testing data and dogpatch work.


68-70gr bullets- VARget, H380 etc.......I have many days reporting 3800fps and great accuracy BUT.....sooner or later there's a "TOO HOT!!" notation explaining wrecked brass etc.

87-88gr VMax's and Bergers using mainly 4831SC/RL-19 class powders show the same pattern........a lot of really promising loads but later "TOO HOT!!"


My notes near the end of my work with the .243AI are more like "I have decided to limit the .243AI to 3650fps w/70's and around 3500fps with 85-88's to give some leeway for temp changes at the dogpatch." This was based on Lapua and Win brass, Norma I'd back off another 50fps. Admittedly these numbers are somewhat conservative BUT....... my deal is all about long life and consistent results.

****************Well......Ok. And good for you!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Around this time I was discovering the 6BR's potential.

Now I'm finding the 6X47L to be a souped up 6BR, accuracy AND safety/caselife.

****** That's wonderful.

Al you're a bore.
 
The 6X47 was (is) shooting round dots @100

Sounds interesting. What does the neck need to be in order to get a no-turn with about .002" clearance? Are dies readily available? How do you expect barrel life to campare to the standard .243?

Thanks,
Tony Carpenter
 
Alinwa.....

Those are some great numbers with the 6/6.5x47L that you are getting.

You know when I talk about velocities in the 243 AI, very seldom did I give a complete description of the barrel length and chamber.

First, the chambers were minimum spec with .0005 over bullet dia throat to seal all the gases behind the bullet instead of blowing around the bullet (Al, I know that I'm preaching to the choir here), ZERO freebore, with a 1 1/2* leade angle, leade angle starting right at the case mouth, .265 neck dia.

Second the barrels were 28-30" long 1-12 twists.

Third, the bullets were 70g TNT, 70g NOsler, or my 70g Customs loaded in a Rem 7/08 fire formed case, with a CCI-250, with 48.0-48.5g of Win 760. ON the 28" barrels, the velocity was usually 3800 or a touch more, and at 48.5 the vel was 3850 usually. Now, at these velocities, I have never even used my full length sizer on a case. What I found out is that when the Velocity on the 70g bullet gets over 3850, the copper fouling is increased exponentially. When I bumped the powder charge to 49.5g and changed the primer to a WLRM primer, the velocity on a 30" barrel was 4030 fps shooting a tiny bug hole. Since I was shooting p. dogs, I needed for the barrel not to copper up, so I choose the slower speeds.

Al, You and I both know that barrel length and individual barrels can have a dramatic effect on speed. Get a Bore that is oversize and your speed is much less. I always shot Hart barrels and they put the dia on the outside of the barrel so you know exactly what you are dealing with.

I tried working up a load with the Sierra 85g BTHP and at 45.5g of 760, I got bug holes with high pressure signs on the cases, and a boat load of copper in my barrel due to the increased bullet's bearing surface. I threw those cases away and shot up the 85's in a 6 Rem on yotes.

I think that a lot of these issues on speed are dealing with the yield strength on brass and the Lapua is no doubt the Mack Daddy of Hard brass. I always thought that it would be interesting to see some of the other brands of brass shot and compared with Lapua. I have been wanting to do this with the Lapua and compare it to the Rem 7/08 that I have been shooting in the 243 AI. I had some Rockwell testing of PMC, Fed, Win, And Rem cases a few years back and needless to say, the Rc of the brass is all over the map. You would think that the guy that is mixing the alloy is smok'en dope while he is mixing the batch. PMC was in a class by it's self regarding how hard it is, far better than the others!

Al, also when you have a fast twist and try to shoot light bullets, in experience you will have a slower speed compared to a twist rate that is appropriate to the size for the bullet. I found this to be true in a Custom 223 with a 1-9 twist compared to a 14 twist, in a 22 PPC with a 1-9 twist compared to a 14 twist. Also, if you are shooting the 70's in a barrel that is throated for long bullets, you are loosing a lot of pressures as the gas blows by the bullet in the throat, which is where you may be not getting the velocity numbers that I have been getting.

Al, I would in no way attack you, this has been a very good learing discussion. I would really appreciate it if you could get me a copy of the Reamer that you are using in the 6/6.5x47L.
 
Last edited:
My 6x284 and 70gr Noslers

My 6x284 with 26" Hart BBL can push 70 gr bullets to 4,000 FPS. However I think I'm using a bunch more powder then that 6x47L. I do it with 56.3grs of H4350 bullet seated into lands.
 
OK Keith,

I haven't forgotten about you or any of the others looking for reamer spec's. I have my 6BR reamer spec ready to hand I just can't get it sent, our printer/faxer/scanner/copier thingy is having installment issues. We can send faxes and that's about it.

Tony C,

I don't know about dies as far as "readily available" because I don't believe in factory dies UNLESS the reamer is ground for the die. IMO the resizing die will be .002 smaller at base and shoulder for the 6X47L..... Period........Any sort of mismatch will result in "case growth", split necks and sundry other vascular diseases up to and including case failure due to case head separation.....

A no-turn neck will be .272 to be wicked safe. My necks come in at .2701-.2703 in the current lot using Euber 108VLD's. Allowing for different fatnesses and pressure rings I'd still go for the .272, going up to .273 gives a larger "safety factor" but IMO you will lose some accuracy with VLD's. BTW this "safety factor" gets 'way too much airplay. I am a Total Safety Geek and I don't worry about a tight neck. CRIMPING a neck due to it being too long can be a safety concern but even a scuff-fit neck diameter poses no threat that I know of. They may not SHOOT as good but there's no safety problem. Loading single-shot that is! ;) I bring fitted necks out into the field, the varmint patch, no problems. Get the mythical "piece of grit" in there and the bugger simply will not close :)




Worker,

The 6X47L will do 4000fps with 70's using 44gr VARget.

al
 
The People want to know

Al the collective wants to know the case capacity of stated cartridge? No doubt fabricated by the oppressed proletariat.......
 
Worker,

About 48 and 3/4 grains of water.

I didn't do anything fancy here.....I just walked down and grabbed 3 fireformed cases, weighed each case, zero'd the scale and filled each one from the sink. I set the faucet to a small stream, ran it into the tilted case. I wiped off the cases, tapped each case and set the meniscus at the case mouth to look "similar". I didn't do the whole "remove the fired primer" routine. No soap, just tap water.

The three cases held 48.86gr, 48.76gr and 48.98gr water respectively, fired primer intact and no attempt to "fill it" with a syringe.

To get 44gr of VARget under the bullet I must trickle slowly through a modified funnel/drop tube. Just dumping the VARget in, 43gr is up in the nk. My chamber is throated so that the 70gr bullets i used set about 1/3 into the nk. VARget is a "safe" powder for this application in the sense that H322/VV133 is "safe" in a PPC. A full case of H4350 is similarly "safe" for 105/108gr VLD's. It's HARD to get too much in. Nearly impossible to do more than wreck a primer pocket.

IN THIS LIGHT, I consider the two powders listed to be good choices for the bullet weights listed.

With H4350 I trickle to make 42gr, my current standard load of 40gr can be just dumped in and it only comes up the neck a smidge. My rifle is specifically throated for a very long VLD bullet, the Euber 108. BTW 42gr is TOO HOT for my rifle. 41gr of H4350 yields 3200-3250 depending on the day, this is also HOT!

40gr H4350 is a solid 3100fps load for MY RIFLE with the bullets seated deeply into the neck. The boattail junction is about .100 above the n/s junction with most of my seating depths. Most rifles will probably be throated even longer than mine and even with my throat using any other VLD like Sierra, Berger, Lapua etc gives more breathing room. The Euber is the least forgiving of the lot.

NOTE that this test-bed rifle was chambered using a 6BR reamer. The natural neck of the 6X47 comes out about 30thou SHORTER than a 6BR neck resulting in an enormous "gapspace" of over 30thou. My chamber was reamed with a 6BR reamer and set to a ".003 short 6X47 GO gauge" ........ this chamber has not been standardized. My chamber is such that the 6.5X47L cases must be shoulder-bumped about .002 when they're necked down. I run them down and back up over a Redding long-taper "expander ball" and then re-bump them to a firm crush-fit. The cases do not shorten on fireforming.

My next reamer will be SHORTENED in the neck eliminating this gapspace. I expect that this may completely change my reloading procedure as it will effectively change the amount of gas leakage present while the bullet is engraving the lands.

THESE LISTED LOADS MAY NOT BE RELEVANT TO ANOTHER CHAMBER but the water capacity of any 6X47L should remain around 48.25gr-48.75gr H2O depending on trim-to length and shoulder setback. And similar velocities will be achievable by carefully starting load workups 3-4gr lower than stated. I've done all this with MY CHAMBER and these loads are the result of painstakingly working up from below.


hth


al
 
Back
Top