Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Democrats introduce bill to ban online Ammo sales

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Eolia Missouri
    Posts
    212

    Democrats introduce bill to ban online Ammo sales

    The White House gave a cool welcome on Monday to Democratic legislation that would effectively ban online or mail-order purchases of ammunition in the aftermath of the mass shooting at an Aurora.

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/w...182934423.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    806
    They try every avenue to control firearms . It never stops''

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Pennsy
    Posts
    80
    Dont worry, thebummer will figure out a way to slap a 500% tax on anything gun related. He was all in for it back when he was a senator and fortunately it went nowhere. If he gets a second term, it's "Katie bar the door!"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    White Marsh Swamp, Whiteville N. C.
    Posts
    319

    Cybersecurity Act (S.3414

    Don't know how true and maybe someone can verify. Senate Democrats have hidden amendment (S A 2575) to ban hi cap magazines, attached to Cybersecurity Act S3414.Where can one verify or discount?
    Quote Originally Posted by nonliberal View Post
    The White House gave a cool welcome on Monday to Democratic legislation that would effectively ban online or mail-order purchases of ammunition in the aftermath of the mass shooting at an Aurora.

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/w...182934423.html
    Last edited by HFV; 07-31-2012 at 12:26 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aurora, co
    Posts
    4,044
    "introducing a bill" is a pr process for elected officials..it allows then to say "see what i did"
    the bills seldom go anywhere....not saying to not watch but there are tons of bills "introduced"...few get anywhere.

    just sayin"

    mike in co

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Eolia Missouri
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by mike in co View Post
    "introducing a bill" is a pr process for elected officials..it allows then to say "see what i did"
    the bills seldom go anywhere....not saying to not watch but there are tons of bills "introduced"...few get anywhere.

    just sayin"

    mike in co
    That is true, but on occasion they gain traction and we get stuck with a 3000 page bill that includes all kinds of little secrets hidden in it. Then they say "we have to pass the bill to see whats in it".

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Eolia Missouri
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by HFV View Post
    Don't know how true and maybe someone can verify. Senate Democrats have hidden amendment (S A 2575) to ban hi cap magazines, attached to Cybersecurity Act S3414.Where can one verify or discount?
    Yes, that is true..

    "This amendment is the brainchild of perennial Senate anti-gunners including Charles Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, Frank Lautenberg, Kristen Gillibrand, Barbara Boxer, Jack Reed and Bob Menendez. Banning big magazines has been a goal of gun prohibitionists since the Clinton ban on semiautomatics and such magazines expired eight years ago".

    http://www.examiner.com/article/ccrk...r-magazine-ban

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oswego, New York
    Posts
    776
    Again the people that haven't got a clue about guns making the rules.

    Joe Salt

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    nw va
    Posts
    17
    what Joe said, bigtime!! dogdude

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    757
    The ban wouldn't be for online per se, that's just an ordering method. It's about mail order ammo. Seems that it would be minor step from there to include ammo componentry.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    Posts
    2,163
    Tom has said what my thoughts have been. If they can somehow manage to ban online sales of ammunition then one of the rocket scientists in DC will figure that someone who orders hundreds or thousands of bullets or cases is likely up to no good too. Nobody ever thinks that some sleaze pushing this stuff is up to no good though.

    Nobody needs more than 20 rounds of ammunition or components to produce 20 rounds. I mean whatcha gonna do start a war?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    San Angelo, Texas
    Posts
    944
    I wonder....if they introduced a Bill that made it mandatory for a Phsyc patient (that was deemed a possible threat to others) be subject to notification of local authorities and or a national list...kinda like a NO FLY list...especially those using prescription drugs for the control of their behavior..???
    Maybe that is too much of an infringement on their private life...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    White Marsh Swamp, Whiteville N. C.
    Posts
    319
    Thank you much , Kevin
    Quote Originally Posted by nonliberal View Post
    Yes, that is true..

    "This amendment is the brainchild of perennial Senate anti-gunners including Charles Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, Frank Lautenberg, Kristen Gillibrand, Barbara Boxer, Jack Reed and Bob Menendez. Banning big magazines has been a goal of gun prohibitionists since the Clinton ban on semiautomatics and such magazines expired eight years ago".

    http://www.examiner.com/article/ccrk...r-magazine-ban

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •