
Originally Posted by
PedroS
Are we different?
Do we perform differently?
Do we think differently?
Let's look at other shooting disciplines for a moment...
ISSF is all about coaches...
Archery is all about coaches...
Why benchrest is different?
Maybe our age range is the difference... benchrest doesn't have a school, archery does, ISSF does... just to name a few.
Maybe our declining in numbers, and not triggering the same interest among youngsters is because there's no place to learn.
Being seasoned shooters, national champions, world champions, whatever we are, doesn't mean we don't need a coach.
Yes, we do need a coach! We do need a person that makes us to think the basis again and again, point out the flaws and the positives. A person that anticipate our needs, fears and ambition. A person that designs a training plan and goals, and carries on the shooter to achieve, to excel.
I think we have entered a "bad" circle towards potential coaches... the ones that exist don't want to coach us because they see persons that are too deep in their egos, not having open minds, or at least not listening. On the other hand, we are not creating a school that could developed benchrest coaches.
Are we doomed?
Don't think so, but I deeply believe we have to act differently to preserve the sport we love the best.