Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Fire extinguishers and Guns

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Jeddo, Michigan
    Posts
    3,893

    Fire extinguishers and Guns

    Fire extinguishers are now considered a "hazard" in the UK!

    All fire extinguishers may be forcibly removed from apartment buildings, and
    individual residences, throughout the UK! Government eggheads have decided
    that fire extinguishers represent a threat, because their presence encourages
    "untrained people" to take (God forbid!) personal initiative and actually
    extinguish a fire, rather than simply fleeing the building!

    "Risk assessors" further pontificated that typical citizens
    (aka: "idiots")
    might point fire extinguishers in the wrong direction, or use the wrong
    extinguishers. They just can't be trusted to do anything right! Besides, they
    add, with new building regulations, every escape route "should be" fireproof.

    I am left to wonder about those confronting small fires in their kitchens.

    Do you suppose there is even a slight chance they might just figure out how
    to actually use a fire extinguisher for its intended purpose? They're awfully
    complicated, you know!

    I also wonder if all those who are trapped and subsequently burned to death

    in "fireproof" escape routes will find these risk assessors' assurances
    comforting!

    Comment: Among ordained collectivists, every possibility of personal
    initiative must be suffocated! This is the same thinking that underpins
    anti-gun
    politics in this country. They only want victims. Being a "good victim" is
    thus one's ultimate civic responsibility!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Williamsport, PA
    Posts
    1,654
    I think this comes down to the legal system, insurance companies and liability. See, the liability of having a person die in a fire is far greater if you didn't teach them "properly" how to use the fire extinguisher. Soooo, you have to tell them that if there's a fire, just get out, and hope they do that correctly or you'll pay for that too.

    At some point, I say stuff like this comes under the heading of natural attrition. A conversation here at work revealed that this is happening in industry here as well. They can't remove the extinguishers cause OSHA will have a fit about that, but they can tell you in a fire to just leave.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Wenatchee, WA
    Posts
    686
    At my work place - a hydro power plant - they went through a couple years ago and removed all the *fire hoses*. They were stationed at various locations around the plant, connected to a main header that is supplied from a rather large river (via the normal oversized fire pumps). But it costs a fair amount to train people on a recurring basis to be 'proficient', and to have the hoses inspected, and the insurance company insisted that the hoses be *removed* so you didn't have a dedicated employee try and fight the fire. Throw a fire extinguisher at it, if that doesn't work, haul ass and call the fire department... who now has to lug their own hoses down into the site. Freakin' brilliant. Very frustrating after being in Navy submarines, where you *were* the fire department, so you got trained to handle the situation, not hand it off to someone lese, or after being at a nuke power plant where they had such a good fire-fighting training setup just outside the plant, that the local city fire departments came *there* to train (helped pay for the place, too).

    Friggin' nanny states.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    289

    You'd be surprised

    at the number of people who don't know how to properly use a fire extinguisher or the correct one. The fire watch training that takes place at the nuke plants clearly shows 85% of the students in training have no clue as to how to use one correctly. I wonder if the UK will ban the presence of extinguishers on boats also??? A lot like someone new to shooting a gun correctly. Point it and squeeze the trigger? Yea, right!
    Last edited by RStiefel; 12-03-2008 at 12:09 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    White Hall, Maryland
    Posts
    319

    Insurance

    I have a friend that lives in a high end town house community. The county in which he lives mandates sprinkler systems in all new homes. He has to pay to have it inspected every 2 years and he pays a premium on his homeowners insurance due to the risk of an accidental discharge. Go figure.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    Posts
    2,163
    Since the idea of any kind of self defense is so repellant to the British, it only makes sense that the idea of someone using their own initiative to put out a small fire would also be considered bad. I wonder how they will enforce the removal of fire extinguishers from people's homes? Declare those evil things contraband like guns and pointy knives?

    What we have to look forward to in our future maybe?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    930

    Cool Somebody told me......

    that in britain, or maybe new york, they wanted all the Chefs to register their kitchen knives!!
    After all, once one has been done in by a berserk Chef, it'll be nice for your heirs to know just WHICH one will be charged!!! ".....yes ma'am, we eliminated the Jap sushi-boy an' the Aleut whale skinner becuz no Ulus or Katanas were used; funny thing, though, there was so much damage, we had to check EVERY fire-ax in EVERY firehouse between here an' Punxatawney before we could safely eliminate a fireman that may have gotten ptomaine from a spoiled shrimp" "Well, detective, I'm so relieved your men......" Well, ahem, you know what I mean.

    Hey!! There has to be SOME excuse for hiring bureaucrats & inspectors, right?? Remember this....? "....He has erected a multitude of New Offices and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.-...." ???

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    washington.........STATE that is.
    Posts
    8,276
    Quote Originally Posted by brian roberts View Post
    Remember this....? "....He has erected a multitude of New Offices and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.-...." ???
    No I don't but I'm piqued....... who and where is this from?


    al

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Lower Dakota Territory
    Posts
    1,691
    The author is John Hancock.

    The title of the work is: 'The Declaration of Independence'. -Al
    Last edited by Al Nyhus; 12-03-2008 at 09:19 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    washington.........STATE that is.
    Posts
    8,276
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Nyhus View Post
    The author is John Hancock.

    The title of the work is: 'The Delaration of Independence'. -Al
    ka-TCHING!!!

    (insert little slapping forehead emoticon here)

    Thanks Al

    al

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    930

    Al......,

    that's from...(drum roll, here)ta-DAAhh!! The Declaration of INDEPENDENCE!!! Brought to you by a bunch of nondescript ol' White guys who had the audacity to believe you should live in a land, & be able to say what was on your mind, along w/other out-moded ideals, like being as good as your word,(w/out some lawyer writing everything down), and keeping guns at home(SO important that many states REFUSED to ratify w/out that inclusion) as well as other crap, like, a REPUBLIC, where the property owners voted. But, as we can see, that really wouldn't work in modern times like these(that try men's souls). Besides, who did these guys think they were anyway?? They were buffoons, who only had an average of seventeen years of education, ah, well, time marches on. But... one thing's for sure...... they certainly had command of the language, with surgical precision, I would give(as one of my departed friends used to say)"my box seat in hell" to see Patrick Henry on stage, delivering some of his oratory.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    washington.........STATE that is.
    Posts
    8,276
    Quote Originally Posted by brian roberts View Post
    that's from...(drum roll, here)ta-DAAhh!! The Declaration of INDEPENDENCE!!! Brought to you by a bunch of nondescript ol' White guys who had the audacity to believe you should live in a land, & be able to say what was on your mind, along w/other out-moded ideals, like being as good as your word,(w/out some lawyer writing everything down), and keeping guns at home(SO important that many states REFUSED to ratify w/out that inclusion) as well as other crap, like, a REPUBLIC, where the property owners voted. But, as we can see, that really wouldn't work in modern times like these(that try men's souls). Besides, who did these guys think they were anyway?? They were buffoons, who only had an average of seventeen years of education, ah, well, time marches on. But... one thing's for sure...... they certainly had command of the language, with surgical precision, I would give(as one of my departed friends used to say)"my box seat in hell" to see Patrick Henry on stage, delivering some of his oratory.
    I stand, eyes downcast, chastised, chastened.

    I agree heartily with the last line. Early American and English prose were wonderful things. I believe that the English have maintained more of an interest in expressing themselves well than we have. Watching 'Whose Line Is It Anyways' (Brit version) is startling.

    Anyways........... I'm ashamed

    al

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    82

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    930

    No need to be.........

    ashamed, Al, I remembered it because of some key words. Actually, I felt the statement has had more relavency than ever, since about 1980, but particularly in the last sixteen to twenty years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •