Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 300 Win Mag Vs 30-338

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    70

    300 Win Mag Vs 30-338

    What are the pro's and con's (if any) between these two rounds. I have been told that the 30-338 is more efficient and may have a tad more accuracy potential, albeit slightly slower. Probably a moot point since I am having a 30-338 built, but I was curious if there was a consensus one way or the other. My goal is a long range hunting and target (500 yards routine, 1000 yards occasionally) rifle.

    Thanks
    Last edited by CWPINST; 03-12-2008 at 08:18 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kalispell, Mt.
    Posts
    36
    No personal experience with the 30-338, but I would expect your case capacity to be a little less, so probably a little less velocity. You will end up with a longer neck though, and that is one thing that always bugged me about the Win Mag.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by CWPINST View Post
    What are the pro's and con's (if any) between these two rounds. I have been told that the 30-338 is more efficient and may have a tad more accuracy potential, albeit slightly slower. Probably a moot point since I am having a 30-338 built, but I was curious if there was a consensus one way or the other. My goal is a long range hunting and target (500 yards routine, 1000 yards occasionally) rifle.

    Thanks
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


    One case you have to make the other you can buy. Anything else would be just academical.

    Shoot well
    Peter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    40

    300 win mag

    The shorter neck on the WIN MAG means NOTHING!Everything is availible for the WinMag with out paying for custom,plus you have a nice selection of brass.The Win Mag is every bit as accurate as a 30-338!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    28

    300 mag

    i had a custom 30-338, it was a great cartridge, and it was right on the heals of the 300wm. very accurate, but i have had several win mags, and i favor them. more velocity extremely accurate, and good ol lapua brass. br

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    beautiful downtown Linden AZ
    Posts
    1,189
    CW

    It sounds like you are already committed to the 30-338 and it is a VERY GOOD cartridge so don't feel like you'll be handicapped in any way. In its day it was one of the better long range cartridges. (As were all of the other short [2.5"] 30 caliber wildcats of the 50s and 60s.)

    The 30-338 virtually duplicates the 308 Norma Mag and if the Norma had not already existed I'll bet the 300 Win Mag would have looked exactly like the wildcat 30-338.

    One good way to improve on the 300 Win Mag is by making it into a long-neck wildcat. Several noted long range shooters did this back in the 60s and 70s and it won more than its share of fake wood including one National title. You simply ran a 300 Weatherby case (or 340 WBY) into a FL 300 Win Mag die and, voila, a winner every time.

    Of course, at one time, the straight 300 Win Mag was considered to be one of the best long range cartridges there ever was. But is has become old fashioned and not chic and sleek enough for todays shooters.

    Ray

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    398

    I still can't get over this group

    Quote Originally Posted by matthew dienes View Post
    The shorter neck on the WIN MAG means NOTHING!Everything is availible for the WinMag with out paying for custom,plus you have a nice selection of brass.The Win Mag is every bit as accurate as a 30-338!
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    If Matt says the .300WM is accurate, it is and you better believe it.
    2.6"/1000yards/300WM

    Shoot well
    Peter
    Last edited by PPP MMM; 03-13-2008 at 05:12 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    87
    I have a custom built 1000 yard rifle chambered in .30-338. It shoots as good as any 300 Win that I have seen. Brass is not a problem at all,as a matter of fact, you can get Norma brass in .308 Norma magnum. The two cartridges are so close in size that all one needs to do is trim the Norma case length to the 30-338 spec and run the through case through the size die. When I first started reloading for the 30-338, I wanted to eliminate the short shoulder length that is typical of all belted cartridges, so I used 300 Win brass. Using the 308 Norma brass is a LOT less work. One could also opt for the 308 Norma chambering instead. If I had it to do over, I would probably opt for a chambering using a beltless case, such as a shortened Ultramag. when the Ultramag first came out, some folks discovered that quality brass was available from European manufacturers. RWS comes to mind. I believe there are others. "JayIdaho" is the one that brought this to my attention.
    As for the various 300 magnum cartridges, any of them are plenty fast enough and accuracy is exceptional. I see no reason to re-invent the wheel by going for a widcat. Wildcats have less resale appeal than standardized chamberings. That said, build what you want and never look back. All accurate rifles are a joy!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Close to Bodines.
    Posts
    31
    You have made a good choice. I used the .30-338 for 1000-yard High-Power competition for quite a few years. I started using it because the Army Marksmanship Unit used it from the late 1960’s up through the time I was at Fort Benning (in the early 1970’s), and it can shoot just fine. I still have a .30-338 that I had built for long-range hunting. BTW: If your gun is under 12-pounds, get yourself a good muzzle brake… you’ll be glad you did.

    Regarding loads, this was a bit of a problem. The .30-338 shoots the 190gr MatchKing as well, or better, than any caliber I know of. The 66gr IMR-4350, Fed-215M primer, under a Sierra 190gr MatchKing is well known for the number of times it won the Wimbledon and Leech Cup matches. Problem is, the 190gr MatchKing is not particularly well suited as a game bullet. The jacket is hard, and at ranges over 800 yards, sometimes it does not open up too well (unless you hit bone). I tried several of the 200gr game bullet offerings, but they just couldn’t hold a candle to the performance of the 190gr MatchKing. Eventually, I got around this by using a 1-11” twist barrel when my original barrel began to show serious throat erosion. This worked great! I found that I could shoot any of the 200gr match bullets as well as the 190gr MK, and the 200gr SBT GameKing bullet also shot very well.

    It has only been recently, with Hornady’s 180gr Interbond bullet, that I found the best combination for my gun. Using H-4831 SC (the load is listed in the Sierra 5th Edition manual), I can get this bullet going at 3000fps, with 200-yard groups that are routinely under one-inch. For hunting, I zero the rifle at 300-yards, so anything out to 400 yards requires no correction at all… just put the crosshairs on what needs shooting (anywhere under 400 yards) and shoot. Now the bench rester’s will probably beat on me with a solid-aluminum “heavy-gun” stock, for not doing a bunch of elevation adjustments and wind calculations (they would get even crankier if they knew I was using a Nightforce 8-32x NXS with an NP-1RR reticule that must have been designed for the 30-338/180gr Interbond combination). But for a hunter this is ideal for those shots that develop in a hurry.

    Now, regarding the generally accepted horror of making 30-338 brass… what a crock of pure CRAP! The guys doing all of the moaning have obviously never done it. I have made well over a two thousand pieces of 30-338 brass, and it is no more difficult than doing PROPERLY prepared .308 match brass. Here is my procedure: start with .338 Winchester Magnum brass (I prefer Winchester). Full-length resize a well lubricated case (Imperial resizing lub is the best I have used for this job) in the standard .30-338 FL sizing die (with the decapping/neck expanding button in place). Clean the brass and turn the necks. Check your chamber’s neck diameter. I like to have the necks on my finished (loaded) rounds .005” under the chamber’s neck diameter. I turn my brass accordingly. Next I deburr and inspect the flash holes and true-up the primer pockets. Now, trim the cases to 2.5”, chamfer, clean one last time, and inspect. You may have noticed that there is not one additional step… only the standard preparation necessary for any target ammunition.

    You should feel confident that you have made a good choice in a long-range hunting rifle for your chosen conditions. In the thirty-odd years I’ve been using one, and I have tried and owned several others, I have not found a better 1000-yard deer rifle that can be carried (not carted) into the field.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by CWPINST View Post
    What are the pro's and con's (if any) between these two rounds. I have been told that the 30-338 is more efficient and may have a tad more accuracy potential, albeit slightly slower. Probably a moot point since I am having a 30-338 built, but I was curious if there was a consensus one way or the other. My goal is a long range hunting and target (500 yards routine, 1000 yards occasionally) rifle.

    Thanks
    By now you have had the chance to evaluate your own 30-338, its a hack of a cartridge, mine was built on a p-14 enfield action and it regularly outshoots the newest whiz bang at the ranges, I can at will hit gongs out at 5&6 hundred yards. Just to say welcome to the group of old cartridge big bore shooters, 67.5 grains of IMR 4831 behind a 180 grn sierra boat tale.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •