jackie schmidt
New member
There are a couple in the classifieds, just curious..........jackie
There are a couple in the classifieds, just curious..........jackie
I guess that answers that. Even though one of the scopes is listed as "new in box", it would be considered a secondary purchase as far as warranty was concerned.
I was thinking of getting one to sit atop my Rail Gun........jackie
It looks like their warranty would have an effect on the value of buying second hand.
Not that much it would appear. It seems understandable they would care most about the person who paid them the money. If these scopes do turn out over the long run to be the Best and the Most Reliable scopes in the Benchrest field they will have no lack of customers even with a 5 yr non transferable warranty. Then again A lifetime transferable warranty is worth very little if the vendor fails to provide good service.I kind of wonder how much they CARE about resale value ??
Bill
Many of you know that I have told shooters that when we would freeze a scope to be used with external adjustable mounts. of course the warranty would be void. That is a no-brainer. But since very little can happen to a scope the way I freeze them, (aside from dropping the Rifle), it is really a non issue. But even at that, if I crack a lens, or break a reticle, Leupold will fix it, for what ever the going rate for that service is. I just have to be willing to pay.
If a shooter wants to sell a used product for new cost, but without a warranty that does indeed have a certain value on the market, then you are probably better off buying new.
If someone purchaced a March Scope used, and had a problem, I am sure March would fix it for what ever the going rate for that service would be. Spending a couple of hundred dollars to fix a otherwise fine product does not seem unreasonable, as long as the product would then perform up to the standards for which it was built.........jackie