Search results

Thanks. The high participation in producing a vaccine suggests that the virus is more virulent than some would have us believe.

The way I read it, the number of tests haven't increased lately, but the number of cases found has more than doubled from 20,000 odd a day to up to 50,000.

Damn, that can do the shorts a mass of damage.

Maybe if I was after an assertive hunting load, but I prefer my drop tube with the helix start to spin the powder which does the job consistently.

This is what's great about free enterprise - you let them sell it themselves.

Hell's teeth. One of my heroes from the Madden era & he's younger than I am!

And I'm guessing most of us want to go out that way.

Any chance that you're sizing the body/shoulder of the brass too much? There seems to be a lot going on with the base of those cases. The circular mark mid rim is unusual; the neat junction between primer & case could suggest pressure but equally be the result of the primer exiting the case a...

Be thankful it ain't washing them for you.

... and if you don't qualify?

That's the model wildebeests use to manage lions - kill off the less fit. It doesn't strike me as being a model for a civilized society.

My ophthalmologist explained that the power of the replacement lens required was a function of the distance from the cornea to the retina. LASIK makes an unknown (to your doctor) change to the normal cornea, which means that the measurements are likely not to be correct.

And why not? They're so much more competent than we are.

Lockdown isn't all that bad. The thumb prints on the throat disappear after a few days.

When I had cataracts removed, I decided to get lenses for long vision in both eyes, solely for my shooting needs. I don't regret it. As I recall, replacement lenses come in ½ dioptre increments. As it happened, my left (of) eye is perfect, not corrective need can be detected even with the...

Hell's teeth, Al. I thought we were talking a different language until I googled Traeger. Nice looking weapon.

I hear you, Al, but your concept is flawed. I recall once reading a member of this forum at one time saying that he had the right to choose to smoke stogies on the line. I asked that if I believe that my rights to a smoke free environment were contravened by his actions, would he approve me...

Irrespective of whether your judgment is poor and you cause harm contravening recommendations?

Heck, Al, if the only scientist you believe is a ballistician .....